Articles

Navigation

Full Site Search

Loading...

The navigation select boxes below will direct you to the selected page when you hit enter.

Topical Explanations

Primary Legal Materials

Select by Subject

Select by Species

Select Administrative Topic


World Law

Secondary Legal Materials

Great Apes and the Law

Great Apes and the Law

Maps of State Laws

Map of USA
Share |
Will the Heavens Fall? De-Radicalizing the Precedent-Breaking Decision

Paul Waldau


7 Animal L. 75 (2001)
Publish Date:
2001
Place of Publication: Animal Law Review at Lewis & Clark School of Law
Printable Version

Will the Heavens Fall? De-Radicalizing the Precedent-Breaking Decision

Will the Heavens Fall? De-Radicalizing the Precedent-Breaking Decision (pdf file - 151.54 KB)

This article offers an extended analogy for the purpose of posing basic questions about proposals for granting legal rights to some nonhuman animals. The analogy is drawn from the precedent-breaking eighteenth century English case Somerset v. Stewart, which liberated an African slave. The article argues that one can identify features of the eighteenth century debate which illuminate features of today’s debate over proposed uses of centrally important legal concepts for some nonhuman animals. Using the comparison for the limited task of highlighting the complex cultural backdrop in each situation, the article suggests that the comparison helps one see the nature and possibilities of precedent-breaking decisions that rely on various non-legal resources available to judges who, because of conscience, principle, or policy considerations, choose not to follow established precedent.

 

Top of Page
Share |