Susan, Russell and Mary Phillips v. San Luis Obispo County Department of Animal Regulation

Share |
Case Citation:  2 Civil B015913 Year Case Filed:  1986 Jurisdiction Level:  California Case File Num:  NO. 60146 Defense Attorney:  George & Collins, a Law Corp. and Shaunna Sullivan, Los Osos, for petitioners and appellants. Joyce S.A. Tischler, Animal Legal Defense Fund, Oakland, amicus for petitioners and appellants Drafting Attorney:  James B. Lindholm, Jr., County Counsel; Jac A. Crawford, Assitant County Counsel; John Paul Daly, Deputy County Counsel
Summary: In this petition for a rehearing, respondents argued that the appellate court's decision (Phillips v. Department, 183 Cal.App.3d 372 (1986)) misstates crucial facts concerning the operation of the subject ordinance; that hearings required under the Atascadero ordinances apply to all dogs, not just strays; and that the appellate court may have been misled in its decision to conclude that no notice had been required.
Documents:  PDF icon pbuscapetphillips.pdf (1.01 MB)
Share |