Results
| Title |
Author |
Citation | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOT, CROWDED, AND LEGAL: A LOOK AT INDUSTRIAL AGRICULTURE IN THE UNITED STATES AND BRAZIL | David N. Cassuto & Sarah Saville Cassuto & Sarah Saville | 18 Animal L. 185 (2012) | Over the last sixty years, industrial agriculture has expanded in the United States and throughout the world, including in Brazil. Any benefit this expansion has brought comes at significant environmental and social costs. Industrial agriculture is a leading contributor to global climate change, air and water pollution, deforestation, and dangers in the workplace. This Article discusses the impact of industrial animal agriculture in the U.S. and Brazil. It also examines the laws pertaining to industrial agriculture in both countries and provides a comparative analysis of the two legal regimes. Finally, this Article concludes with the observation that although the price to the U.S. and Brazil of remedying these impacts are high, the costs to humans, animals, and the environment by failing to do so is immeasurable. |
| Symposium: Confronting Barriers To The Courtroom For Animal Advocates - Legal Standing For Animals And Advocates | David Cassuto, Jonathan Loworn, and Katherine Meyer | 13 Animal Law 61 (2006) |
For animal advocates, one of the most significant barriers to the courtroom is standing. In order to litigate on behalf of an animal’s interests in federal court, the advocate must first establish standing by meeting three requirements: (1) the plaintiff must have suffered an injury in fact, (2) the injury must be causally connected to the act about which the plaintiff is complaining, and (3) the court must be able to redress the injury. When it comes to non-human animals, how does an advocate demonstrate an injury to establish standing? In this panel, experts in animal litigation discuss the concept of establishing legal standing for animals and animal advocates; the panelists’ own experiences, including specific cases and creative methods used; and the future of legal standing for animals. |
| Breed Specific Legislation: The Gap in Emergency Preparedness Provisions for Household Pets | Amy Cattafi | 32 Seton Hall Legis. J. 351 (2008) |
This article examines the gap in the legislation and explore how this dilemma has come to pass. First it explores what breed-specific legislation actually is, and how it has developed in modern society. Next, this article addresses the scope of current emergency preparedness statutes. Finally, this article attempts to address the issues that are bound to arise in the future. |
| 2006 Animal Law-Related Articles | Brett Cattani | 13 Animal Law 329 (2007) |
This document provides a listing of animal-related law review and journal articles from 2006. |
| Project on American Animal Welfare Legislation (Spain) | Oriol Caudevilla Parellada | Animal Legal & Historical Center |
This paper examines US animal welfare legislation as viewed from a student in Spain. The paper concludes that while the US has some of the most progressive legislation, there are still topics that need to be addressed. |
| 2005-2006 Case Law Review | Adam Cefai | 2 Journal of Animal Law 179 (2006) |
This document provides a tabular listing of the important animal law cases of 2005 and 2006. |
| PROTECÇÃO DOS ANIMAIS NA CONSTITUIÇÃO DA REPÚBLICA PORTUGUESA | CENTRO DE ÉTICA E DIREITO DOS ANIMAIS | CENTRO DE ÉTICA E DIREITO DOS ANIMAIS |
Considerando a actual Constituição da República Portuguesa, de acordo com a última Revisão Constitucional, feita em 2001, propõe-se a introdução da seguinte disposição na Constituição, devendo a mesma ser incluída na |
| Protecting Cats and Dogs in Order to Protect Humans: Making the Case for a Felony Companion Animal Statute in Mississippi | Deborah J. Challener | 29 Miss. C. L. Rev. 499 (2010) |
This Article proceeds in several parts. Part II discusses the reasons behind the enactment of both early and modern animal cruelty statutes, and part III identifies the common features of modern animal cruelty laws. Part IV details Mississippi's animal cruelty statutes and compares them to typical modern cruelty laws. Part V describes the provisions of Senate Bill No. 2623 in detail and explains why the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation and others opposed Senate Bill No. 2623. Part VI argues that the objections to Senate Bill No. 2623 were frivolous and makes the case for a felony companion animal statute in Mississippi. Finally, part VII contends that a bill modeled on Senate Bill No. 2623 should be introduced during the 2011 legislative session and passed by the Mississippi legislature. |
| ANIMAL CRUELTY LEGISLATION: THE PASADO LAW AND ITS LEGACY | Steve Ann Chambers | 2 Animal L. 193 (1996) | This article was adapted from remarks from Steve Chambers at a symposium held by the Student Animal Legal Defense Fund of Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College on September 23, 1995 regarding issues affecting domestic and captive animals. |
| Chartered Institute of Environmental Health Guidance on the Interpretation of the Pet Animals Act 1951 | Chartered Institute of Environmental Health | Chartered Institute of Environmental Health |
Guidance to local authorities from the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health on the interpretation of the Pet Animals Act 1951 and, in particular, the legality of temporary pet fairs |